Welcome to BSY Co., Ltd., we focus on oleo chemicals!
Home > News


1. Solving the problem of plasticizer standard lag at present, China's foreign trade exports are facing a more severe external environment. In particular, the trend of importing countries to restrict the export of Chinese products and protect their industries with technical barriers to trade is becoming more and more obvious by means of raising quarantine standards and increasing testing projects. At present, Europe, America, Japan and South Korea and other countries have used citric acid esters, epoxy acid esters and other safety and environmental protection Plasticizers as an updated alternative products, have introduced in food packaging, medical supplies, children's toys and other products in contact with the human body to ban DOA, DOP standard profit regulations, and in China's national standards, also explicitly allow the use DOP.  Although it is inconclusive whether these plasticizer varieties are carcinogenic, it is urgent to solve the problem of the lag of plasticizer standard in China because of the lag of relevant standards in China, which leads to a series of problems such as the obstruction of many domestic exports of plastic products and the large entry of products containing obsolete plasticizers.


2. Promotion of risk assessment the launch of the European Commission on Plasticizers and Intermediates (ECP1) technology: Mike Penman, chairman of the Working Group and senior Toxicology consultant for ExxonMobil Petroleum and Chemicals, said the determining factor in determining the availability of a plasticizer was the results of the risk assessment, not the toxicity test.  Sijunjie, chairman of the China Plasticizer Industry Association, also believes that there is no scientific basis for following the following and hype, will undermine the healthy development of Chinese plasticizers and plastics industry, strengthen the Chinese plasticizer toxicity Experiment and risk assessment work is very necessary. To determine whether a plasticizer is available or used, the key is not the results of animal experimental toxicity, but through an in-depth study of the relationship between the use of dosage and toxicity, the relationship between exposure and harmfulness, the relationship between material migration and migration speed and exposure, and then the development of relevant risk control measures, To minimize its harm to the public environment through scientific analysis and means. It is hasty and unscientific to take restrictive measures simply on the basis of the results of hazard identification.     The management of chemicals, including plasticizers, will continue to be more stringent and scientific internationally. The EU system for the registration, assessment, authorization and restriction of chemicals was implemented 2008 ago, and risk assessments will be accepted by more and more people and serve as a basis for the development of various relevant bills. China's work on plasticizer animal toxicity Experiments and risk assessment is still very weak, which is very detrimental to the healthy development of the industry, the relevant domestic aspects should pay attention to the implementation of risk assessment work.